StableLM 3B vs Mixtral 16x7B

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of pricing, performance benchmarks, and capabilities

At a Glance

Best Overall Performance

Mixtral 16x7B

Higher overall benchmarks

Best for Coding

Mixtral 16x7B

82.5% coding score

Best for Reasoning

Mixtral 16x7B

83% reasoning score

Best MMLU Score

Mixtral 16x7B

83.5% general knowledge

Compare Different Models

Detailed Comparison

Feature StableLM 3B Mixtral 16x7B Winner
Provider Stability AI Mistral AI
Context Window 8k 64k
MMLU Score

General knowledge & reasoning

75% 83.5% Mixtral 16x7B
Coding Score

Code generation & debugging

72% 82.5% Mixtral 16x7B
Reasoning Score

Logic & problem-solving

74% 83% Mixtral 16x7B
Release Date 2023 2025
Vision Support ✓ Yes
Function Calling ✓ Yes ✓ Yes

Performance Comparison

MMLU (General Knowledge)

Difference: 8.5%
StableLM 3B 75%
Mixtral 16x7B 83.5%

Coding Performance

Difference: 10.5%
StableLM 3B 72%
Mixtral 16x7B 82.5%

Reasoning & Logic

Difference: 9.0%
StableLM 3B 74%
Mixtral 16x7B 83%

Expert Analysis

Performance Analysis

Mixtral 16x7B outperforms across 3 of 3 benchmarks, with particularly strong coding abilities (82.5%).

Final Verdict

Our comprehensive recommendation based on all factors

Mixtral 16x7B excels in coding benchmarks, outperforming StableLM 3B by 10.5 points—ideal for developers seeking top-tier code generation. Organizations with demanding workloads will benefit from Mixtral 16x7B's capabilities for routine and specialized tasks.

Our Recommendation

Enterprise teams and applications requiring maximum accuracy should choose Mixtral 16x7B for mission-critical deployments where performance is paramount.

Best For These Use Cases

StableLM 3B Excels At:

  • Creative content generation
  • Research assistants
  • Self-hosted experimentation
  • Lightweight chatbots
  • Prototype testing

Mixtral 16x7B Excels At:

  • Self-hosted AI agents
  • High-throughput inference
  • Research experiments
  • Domain-specific fine-tuning
  • Cost-efficient production

Strengths & Weaknesses

StableLM 3B

Strengths

  • Open weights
  • Easy fine-tuning
  • Good creative outputs
  • Community-driven

Considerations

  • Short context
  • Limited multimodal support
  • Moderate reasoning
  • Fewer enterprise tools
Full StableLM 3B Review →

Mixtral 16x7B

Strengths

  • Sparse MoE efficiency
  • Open-weight support
  • High inference throughput
  • Fine-tuning flexibility

Considerations

  • Complex MoE management
  • Limited prebuilt tools
  • Closed multimodal roadmap
  • Requires advanced infra
Full Mixtral 16x7B Review →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: StableLM 3B or Mixtral 16x7B?

Mixtral 16x7B offers superior overall performance with higher benchmark scores across MMLU, coding, and reasoning tests. The best choice depends on your specific use case requirements and performance priorities.

What are the key differences?

Mixtral 16x7B leads in overall performance with higher benchmark scores, while StableLM 3B may offer advantages in specific areas like context window size or specialized capabilities. Both models have their strengths depending on your particular needs.

Which is better for coding?

Mixtral 16x7B leads in coding performance with a score of 82.5%, making it 10.5 percentage points better than StableLM 3B. This makes Mixtral 16x7B the superior choice for software development, code generation, and debugging tasks.

Can I use both models together?

Yes! Many organizations use multiple models strategically: one model for routine tasks where efficiency matters, and another for complex, mission-critical applications requiring maximum accuracy. This hybrid approach optimizes both performance and resource utilization across different use cases.

How often are these benchmarks updated?

We update all benchmark scores and pricing data daily to reflect the latest model versions and API pricing changes. Benchmark scores are sourced from official documentation, independent testing platforms like Artificial Analysis, and peer-reviewed academic evaluations. Last updated: 2/2/2026.

Ready to Get Started?

Choose the AI model that best fits your needs and budget

Or compare other models to find your perfect match