DALL·E 3 vs StableLM 3B
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of pricing, performance benchmarks, and capabilities
At a Glance
Best Overall Performance
StableLM 3B
Higher overall benchmarks
Best for Coding
StableLM 3B
72% coding score
Best for Reasoning
StableLM 3B
74% reasoning score
Best MMLU Score
StableLM 3B
75% general knowledge
Compare Different Models
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | DALL·E 3 | StableLM 3B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Stability AI | — |
| Context Window | n/a | 8k | — |
|
MMLU Score
General knowledge & reasoning | 0% | 75% | StableLM 3B |
|
Coding Score
Code generation & debugging | 0% | 72% | StableLM 3B |
|
Reasoning Score
Logic & problem-solving | 0% | 74% | StableLM 3B |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 | — |
| Vision Support | ✓ Yes | — | — |
| Function Calling | — | ✓ Yes | — |
Performance Comparison
MMLU (General Knowledge)
Difference: 75.0%Coding Performance
Difference: 72.0%Reasoning & Logic
Difference: 74.0%Expert Analysis
Performance Analysis
StableLM 3B outperforms across 3 of 3 benchmarks, with particularly strong coding abilities (72%).
Final Verdict
Our comprehensive recommendation based on all factors
StableLM 3B excels in coding benchmarks, outperforming DALL·E 3 by 72.0 points—ideal for developers seeking top-tier code generation. Organizations with demanding workloads will benefit from StableLM 3B's capabilities for routine and specialized tasks.
Our Recommendation
Enterprise teams and applications requiring maximum accuracy should choose StableLM 3B for mission-critical deployments where performance is paramount.
Best For These Use Cases
DALL·E 3 Excels At:
- Advertising
- Concept art
- Storyboarding
- Product visualization
- Creative projects
StableLM 3B Excels At:
- Creative content generation
- Research assistants
- Self-hosted experimentation
- Lightweight chatbots
- Prototype testing
Strengths & Weaknesses
DALL·E 3
Strengths
- • High-quality photorealism
- • Text-to-image integration
- • API and web access
- • Creative flexibility
Considerations
- • No reasoning abilities
- • Closed-source
- • Limited fine-tuning options
- • Compute-intensive
StableLM 3B
Strengths
- • Open weights
- • Easy fine-tuning
- • Good creative outputs
- • Community-driven
Considerations
- • Short context
- • Limited multimodal support
- • Moderate reasoning
- • Fewer enterprise tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: DALL·E 3 or StableLM 3B?
StableLM 3B offers superior overall performance with higher benchmark scores across MMLU, coding, and reasoning tests. The best choice depends on your specific use case requirements and performance priorities.
What are the key differences?
StableLM 3B leads in overall performance with higher benchmark scores, while DALL·E 3 may offer advantages in specific areas like context window size or specialized capabilities. Both models have their strengths depending on your particular needs.
Which is better for coding?
StableLM 3B leads in coding performance with a score of 72%, making it 72.0 percentage points better than DALL·E 3. This makes StableLM 3B the superior choice for software development, code generation, and debugging tasks.
Can I use both models together?
Yes! Many organizations use multiple models strategically: one model for routine tasks where efficiency matters, and another for complex, mission-critical applications requiring maximum accuracy. This hybrid approach optimizes both performance and resource utilization across different use cases.
How often are these benchmarks updated?
We update all benchmark scores and pricing data daily to reflect the latest model versions and API pricing changes. Benchmark scores are sourced from official documentation, independent testing platforms like Artificial Analysis, and peer-reviewed academic evaluations. Last updated: 2/2/2026.
Ready to Get Started?
Choose the AI model that best fits your needs and budget
Or compare other models to find your perfect match