Gopher vs Falcon 400B

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of pricing, performance benchmarks, and capabilities

At a Glance

Best Overall Performance

Falcon 400B

Higher overall benchmarks

Best for Coding

Falcon 400B

89.5% coding score

Best for Reasoning

Gopher

90% reasoning score

Best MMLU Score

Gopher

90.5% general knowledge

Compare Different Models

Detailed Comparison

Feature Gopher Falcon 400B Winner
Provider DeepMind Technology Innovation Institute
Context Window 64k 128k
MMLU Score

General knowledge & reasoning

90.5% 90% Gopher
Coding Score

Code generation & debugging

88% 89.5% Falcon 400B
Reasoning Score

Logic & problem-solving

90% 89.7% Gopher
Release Date 2024 2026
Vision Support ✓ Yes
Function Calling ✓ Yes ✓ Yes

Performance Comparison

MMLU (General Knowledge)

Difference: 0.5%
Gopher 90.5%
Falcon 400B 90%

Coding Performance

Difference: 1.5%
Gopher 88%
Falcon 400B 89.5%

Reasoning & Logic

Difference: 0.3%
Gopher 90%
Falcon 400B 89.7%

Expert Analysis

Performance Analysis

Falcon 400B outperforms across 1 of 3 benchmarks, with particularly strong coding abilities (89.5%).

Final Verdict

Our comprehensive recommendation based on all factors

Both models show comparable coding performance, with less than 5 points separating them on benchmark tests. The optimal choice between these models depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.

Our Recommendation

Choose Falcon 400B for applications where response quality directly impacts business outcomes, or evaluate both models based on your specific use case requirements.

Best For These Use Cases

Gopher Excels At:

  • Scientific research assistant
  • Academic content generation
  • High-level reasoning tasks
  • Research document summarization
  • Knowledge discovery

Falcon 400B Excels At:

  • Large research assistants
  • Foundation for custom AI stacks
  • Instruction-tuned agents
  • Benchmark research
  • High-capacity RAG

Strengths & Weaknesses

Gopher

Strengths

  • High reasoning accuracy
  • Strong academic knowledge
  • Open research integration
  • Scientific domain capabilities

Considerations

  • Limited multimodal support
  • Shorter context
  • Not fully enterprise-ready
  • Closed ecosystem for deployment
Full Gopher Review →

Falcon 400B

Strengths

  • Huge model capacity
  • Strong open research benchmarks
  • Support for instruction variants
  • Large-scale agent foundation

Considerations

  • Extremely high infra costs
  • Complex self-hosting
  • Safety tools community-managed
  • Deployment custom tooling needed
Full Falcon 400B Review →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: Gopher or Falcon 400B?

Falcon 400B offers superior overall performance with higher benchmark scores across MMLU, coding, and reasoning tests. The best choice depends on your specific use case requirements and performance priorities.

What are the key differences?

Falcon 400B leads in overall performance with higher benchmark scores, while Gopher may offer advantages in specific areas like context window size or specialized capabilities. Both models have their strengths depending on your particular needs.

Which is better for coding?

Falcon 400B leads in coding performance with a score of 89.5%, making it 1.5 percentage points better than Gopher. This makes Falcon 400B the superior choice for software development, code generation, and debugging tasks.

Can I use both models together?

Yes! Many organizations use multiple models strategically: one model for routine tasks where efficiency matters, and another for complex, mission-critical applications requiring maximum accuracy. This hybrid approach optimizes both performance and resource utilization across different use cases.

How often are these benchmarks updated?

We update all benchmark scores and pricing data daily to reflect the latest model versions and API pricing changes. Benchmark scores are sourced from official documentation, independent testing platforms like Artificial Analysis, and peer-reviewed academic evaluations. Last updated: 2/2/2026.

Ready to Get Started?

Choose the AI model that best fits your needs and budget

Or compare other models to find your perfect match